Environmental Sustainability of Residential Wood and Pellet Heating
The Alliance for Green Heat’s mission is to promote cleaner and more efficient wood and pellet heating. While our primary focus is on the technology and the regulatory environment around combustion, the sustainable supply and use of firewood and pellets is also paramount to our mission.
For AGH the most pressing sustainability issue is excessive wood smoke in many neighborhoods and rural areas from wood stoves and wood boilers that are not being used properly, or the technology is so poor that they cannot be used without creating excessive smoke. We believe that advanced combustion wood and pellet stoves, furnaces and boilers can produce renewable residential heat with minimal amounts of air pollution, compared to the alternative environmental impacts caused by the extraction, transport, refining and use of electricity, gas and oil heating appliances.
Generally, we do not feel that there are major sustainability issues facing the supply of firewood and pellets for the residential heating market, but there are areas of concern currently – and historically.
Deforestation of the eastern and central US was rampant in the 1700 and 1800’s, peaking around 1900, due to clearing forest for agriculture, building development, industrial energy, home heating, cooking, etc. The advent of coal use and later oil and gas lead to dramatic reductions in the use of wood for energy. Use of wood for heating homes went from nearly 100% in the early 1800s, to 22% in 1940 when the US Census started tracking it, and continued its rapid decline as fossil fuels were enthusiastically embraced through the 1950s and 60s. By 1970 only 1.3 % of the country heated primarily with wood. By 1990, after heating oil prices rose, 3.9% of the country heated primarily with wood, and today the number rests at about 2.1% of the population, concentrated in northern and mountainous wooded areas.
We believe that the nation’s firewood supply is very sustainable for a number of reasons. The reverse is true in many developing world countries where firewood demand vastly outstrips supply. In the US, firewood collection is marked by the following trends:
- Studies find that 50 – 70% of firewood is cut or collected by the homeowners that use it, indicating extremely local and small scale firewood collection.
- Homeowners typically cut or collect wood in ways that are low impact on the neighborhood or forest.
- The firewood industry is dominated by mom and pop businesses that engage in very small scale, decentralized harvesting of trees, not utilized for higher value products (at larger scales, both homeowner and commercial firewood harvesting could lead to sustainability issues in certain ecosystems).
- A large portion of commercially sold firewood in urban and suburban areas is from arborists tree services that took down trees for other reasons.
Three firewood surveys conducted by the State of Minnesota between 2002 and 2013 provide some of the most detailed state level data about firewood usage and harvesting. The 2013 survey found that 80% of residential firewood was harvested by households and no wood vendor in Minnesota has over 1% of the market.
Part of the nation’s firewood supply comes from larger commercial harvesting practices. Typically the firewood comes from trees with defects that make them unusable for milling into higher value products or from trees too small to be milled. If there is no market for these trees, often they are left to rot or are piled and burned to reduce wildfire risk.
In the last few years, over a dozen states have developed additional guidelines to protect ecosystem services provided by forests, like water quality, wildlife, soil productivity, and others while harvesting wood for energy (“biomass”). Some regional guidelines have also been developed.
The sustainable use of firewood also involves responsible transport so that firewood users do not help move invasive insects and diseases to new areas. The Don’t Move Firewood campaign provides a vital role educating homeowners about this issue, which most frequently involves transporting wood for recreational campfires.
In terms of sustainable levels of emissions, pellet heating is typically much cleaner than chunk wood, although masonry heaters, some catalytic and hybrid stoves can be as clean and efficient as pellet heat when they are used properly. [hyperlink to AGH materials on these cleaner heaters.]
Even the cleanest pellet heating will not be as clean as gas, oil or propane at the point of combustion. But in a full life-cycle analysis, when harvested sustainably, pellet heating likely has far less negative environmental impacts than fossil fuel heating.
In terms of wood supply, over the past three decades, since residential pellet heating has taken off in the United States, the overwhelming majority of wood to make pellets has been sawdust from sawmills, furniture factories and other wood processing companies. The stream of fiber for domestic pellet heating has been sustainable because the sawdust from those factories was often considered a waste product.
More recently, sawdust has become more valuable and today it is sold for a variety of uses, from particleboard to animal bedding to pulp and paper. As dry sawdust has become more valuable and more competitive, and demand for pellets has risen, more pellet producers are using wood chips or logs traditionally used in the pulp and paper industry to make pellets. Wood chips and logs increase production expenses because they have to be ground up and dried, so they are the last resort for pellet producers.
Like any industry, the logging industry has some rogue operators and companies that skirt or bend regulations, and it is possible that some of the wood that they cut gets into the pellet fuel supply. Bad actors may be more prevalent in states with weaker regulations or enforcement and this would impact the stream of fiber for sawlogs, pulp and paper and every other use of wood.
The fiber supply for pellets produced in the Southeastern US for export to Europe is different and more complex and is currently independent from domestic residential use.
We advocate for policies that promote efficient use of wood. Heating and combined heat and power are typically in the 60 – 80% efficiency range, whereas it is in the 20 – 30% range for electricity alone.